WPM-A - Special Session: Social and Ethical Values in Radiation Protection Orlando IV 14:20 - 17:15
|
| Chair(s): Nichole Martinez, Kendall Berry
|
| |
WPM-A.0
14:15 Introduction
|
WPM-A.1
14:20 Applying the Cultural Tool-Kit Perspective to Foster Inclusive Interactions AJ Koontz*, University of Central Florida
Abstract: While the increased attention to diversity and inclusion can be considered positive, for many in established positions it can also be overwhelming. Discussions of different ways to interact can feel personal or increase defensiveness, rather than opening lines of communication. The intent of this presentation is to make abstract concepts more concrete, allowing participants to practice adopting another’s perspective and set a take-away goal. The presentation will introduce participants to the cultural tool-kit perspective. From this perspective, culture can be seen as a resource, in that individuals draw from symbols, ideals, and ideologies to construct identities and courses of action. Peoples’ habits, skills, and styles are based in this tool-kit, affecting their networks and cultural knowledge, along with how they mobilize resources to achieve goals and solve problems. People enter an institution with certain tool kits, so that classrooms or working contexts can be understood as places where new action strategies are developed and practical problems are negotiated. It is thus important to note that these cultural worldviews shape the way people perceive the meanings of race, class, gender, and age, with action strategies affected by these demographic traits, versus isolated cases based on personal values or one person’s attitude. Rather than assuming differences in personal values, this approach draws attention to how peoples’ actions differ based on their exposure to strategies. Individuals will likely experience less friction when entering a new context with tools and strategies of action syncing with the hegemonic culture (middle class; white). We can then discuss tactics of professional socialization through associated tool kits, helping participants to adopt a new approach to understanding the ways that others will pursue academic, career, and social goals and how to support these goals.
After explaining the cultural tool-kit perspective as an approach to interactions, participants will be asked to consider something they may take for granted, and then consider different ways that the same topic could be approached. We will use this as an example that participants can then create one personal goal that they can use in future interactions within their own learning or work environment.
|
WPM-A.2
15:00 Accommodating Personnel with Disabilities – What does Accessibility Really Mean? LM Manglass*, Clemson University
Abstract: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is a law that not only prohibits discrimination against Americans with disabilities but also requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities. But what does this mean? Those with disabilities are still discriminated against in the hiring process because of assumptions about their ability to perform job tasks. This is evidenced by disproportionately high rates of unemployment among populations who are actively seeking work. Despite this, people impacted by disabilities are often left out of the discussion on inclusivity. The presentation will cover the basics about how ADA applies to the workplace and how implementation of this law applies in the radiation protection community. A discussion on what reasonable accommodations are and how to best implement them in the workplace will also work to dispel some common misconceptions about how disabilities may or may not prevent personnel from fulfilling the duties of their job description. Additionally, this presentation will also discuss the difference between conforming to the legal requirements of ADA and providing an inclusive work place that is truly accessible to those who are impacted by disabilities.
|
WPM-A.3
15:15 The Mentor–Apprentice Relationship: A Closer Look of Intergenerational Interactions in the Workplace DJ Trimas*, University of Michigan
; NE Martinez, Clemson University
Abstract: Effective mentorship is well known to be essential in career development. Moreover, it can increase retention, improve morale and well-being, promote the integrity of the field, and foster solidarity. An important component to mentorship is open communication and clear expectations for both the mentor and mentee/apprentice. The variety of perspectives brought to the workplace by a diversity of cultures and backgrounds is beneficial to the final product, but it may also mean differing communication strategies are employed, which has the potential to lead to misunderstandings. How can researchers of different generational backgrounds or personalities communicate more effectively? What are the problems faced when communicating with someone of a different life stage or with different formative experiences? Communication in this instance is not so different than communication between experts and the public; the need for mutual trust and respect, thoughtful language choices, and active listening on the part of both parties are essential elements for communication to be successful. This presentation considers the mentor-apprentice relationship as a representative example of an intergenerational workplace relationship from the student perspective. Potential conflicts between parties will be discussed and mutually beneficial solutions proposed for consideration.
|
WPM-A.4
15:30 The Hidden Keys to a Successful Radiation Protection Culture MB Lee*, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Abstract: There are no differences between sectors when it comes to radiation protection principles. How radiation protection principles are implemented defines how a radiation protection culture will be perceived in an organization. The generation that developed radiation safety and radiation protection are retiring and there is a need to emphasize the importance of organizational radiation protection cultures to incoming generations. A radiation protection culture is considered a subset of a safety culture, and is defined as the combination of knowledge, beliefs, behaviors, priorities and practices related to radiation safety for workers, the public and the environment. Professionals in the radiation protection echelons have a key role in creating an effective radiation protection culture. This presentation reveals the keys that are vital to unlocking a successful radiation protection culture.
|
WPM-A.5
16:00 Fostering Empathy Through Shared Experiences KE Berry*, Fox Chase Cancer Center
; CM Root, Princeton University
Abstract: “The mission of the Health Physics Society (HPS) is to promote excellence in the science and practice of radiation safety. Essential to this mission are the open exchange of ideas, freedom of thought and expression, and productive scientific debate, which require an open, diverse environment, free of bias and intimidation, built on dignity and mutual respect for all participants.” These are the opening statements in the HPS Behavior Policy that was adopted in December 2017. The policy has been viewed as welcome by some and as unnecessary by other HPS members. The authors recognize that the majority of HPS members set the example of professionalism in science, however the aim is to help ensure that we as HPS members, maintain this standard as we move forward. It is our hope that shared experiences can help build empathy among the society. To that end, an anonymous survey was distributed and evaluated to shed light on the necessity for a respectful behavior policy to enhance our continued excellence and professionalism as a society. We hope that by anonymously illuminating some behaviors that members have faced in the past at HPS events, acceptance of the policy will improve and we will treat each other respectfully, consistently.
|
WPM-A.6
16:15 Alignment of the Definition of Health Physics and Job Description of a Health Physicist: Resetting the Mortar in the Foundation to Evolve a Stronger Organization. DA Sowers*, NAVSEA DET RASO
Abstract: What’s in a name? Everything. Branding is as critical in health physics as it is in politics and business. Greater than 10 unique definitions for the title “health physics” and the job description of a health physicist are found with a simple website and textbook search. The Health Physics Society’s Public Information Committee has identified this as a critical foundational piece requiring alignment; convergence in this most seemingly insignificant definition will pay huge dividends as the Society – and indeed our profession – continues to stay relevant in a changing climate. This talk discusses the background in our job title and the pathway forward for a single definition aligned throughout our diverse employment sectors. We’re all impacted by this in some way. Help us help you by providing feedback, input, and buy-in. If you only contribute a few minutes this year to an extra-employment activity, shouldn’t this talk and initiative be where your time is best invested?
|
WPM-A.7
16:30 The HPS Student Support Committee: Current Initiatives DA Montgomery*, Clemson University
; CA Condon, Oregon State University; D Poudel, Los Alamos National Laboratory; J Kuchta, University of Michigan
Abstract: Did you know that the HPS Student Support Committee (SSC) sponsors and leads various activities and initiatives throughout the year and at the annual HPS Meetings? Overall, these activities aim to improve student-society communication and relations, enhance student membership experiences, and ensure student members have a voice in the society. Do you have any great ideas that you think will improve student and young member experiences and overall involvement in the society? We want to hear them! In this discussion-based presentation, members of the HPS SSC will review the current and proposed initiatives the committee is leading, including: the current and new Mentor programs of HP Connect, the HP Volunteer program that helps students become more involved with the society in various capacities, the Student Corner column in HP News and the SSC Facebook page, the annual HPS Quiz Bowl, and our efforts to keep Student HPS chapters in touch with the Society. We intend for the overview of our current and proposed efforts to spark audience engagement, promote critical feedback of our current activities, and possibly prompt new initiatives so that we can continue to improve the work of the SSC in support of the Society as a whole.
|
WPM-A.8
16:45 Getting Involved in the Health Physics Society –Straightforward and Rewarding AA Simpkins*, NV5/Dade Moeller
; Simpkins
Abstract: The Health Physics Society (HPS) is a professional organization with nearly 4,000 members, and as such, has numerous opportunities for members to volunteer to serve in various capacities at the local and national level. Locally, individuals can (and should!) get involved with their chapter and serve as officers and on committees. Nationally, individuals are needed to serve as Officers, Board Members, on Committees and Task Forces, and on Section Boards, to name a few. Members often don’t know where to start when they are interested in volunteering. All that is needed is a willingness to serve and a few tips on how to do so. Time commitments vary based on the position, activity, and/or degree of involvement. The HPS website provides a wealth of information on the various opportunities available. Having been involved in HPS for more than twenty years and serving in numerous capacities and leadership roles, personal experiences regarding getting involved and typical progressions from local to national level positions will be discussed.
|
WPM-A.9
17:00 The NCRP: Why You Need to Know About This Organization? JJ Lanza*, Florida Department of Health
Abstract: The NCRP was chartered by the U.S. Congress in 1964 as the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Historically, the NCRP has been active in the areas of radiation protection and measurements since its inception as “The Advisory Committee on X-Ray and Radium Protection” in 1929. It was originally established to represent all national radiological organizations in the United States on a collective, scientific basis, and to serve as the United States national analog of the organization now known as the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The mission of the NCRP is to support radiation protection by providing independent scientific analysis, information, and recommendations that represent the consensus of leading scientists. The NCRP Congressional Charter recognizes the importance and the national character of the organization, but that does not make the Council a governmental body; it is a private corporation that has never received direct funding from Congress. The work of the NCRP has a significant impact on almost all activities in the United States which create or utilize radiation. The recommendations of the Council are important to: radiation users including those in medicine, industry, and government; the general public; and, other state, national, and international groups concerned with radiation matters. Effective dissemination of information about radiation properties and effects requires that the measurement techniques employed and the quantities and units used are comparable throughout the United States and the world. The Council contributes to this goal by formulating and publishing the consensus of scientific opinion on various radiation measurement problems. Participants in the Council’s programs voluntarily contribute their services in support of the organization’s objectives. Their abilities and experiences represent the cornerstone of the Council’s programs and are a major force for progress in radiation protection and measurement. This presentation will: review the organization and leadership of the NCRP; recognize its many accomplishments; and, then consider future activities of the Council.
|
